Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4100 (CHH)

MRIDULA SAHU (IN PERSON) v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,

CRMP/257/2025 · 2025-03-11

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12109 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 257 of 2025 Mridula Sahu (In Person) W/o Dheeraj Sahu Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Mohara Thana And Tahsil Seepat District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - District Magistrate, District Bilaspur, Office Of District Magistrate, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.). 2 - Superintendent Of Police Office Of The Superintendent Of Police, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3 - Officer-In-Charge Of Aarakshi Kendra Aarakshi Kendra Seepat, Tahsil Seepat District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4 - Dheeraj Sahu S/o Buddheshwar Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Gopal Saw Mil, Budhwari Bazar, Sakti Tahsil And District Sakti (C.G.) 5 - Buddheshwar Sahu S/o Heeraram Sahu Aged About 65 Years R/o Gopal Saw Mil, Budhwari Bazar, Sakti Tahsil And District Sakti (C.G.) 6 - Mana Devi W/o Buddheshwar Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Gopal Saw Mil, Budhwari Bazar, Sakti Tahsil And District Sakti (C.G.) 7 - Neeraj Sahu S/o Buddheshwar Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Gopal Saw Mil, Budhwari Bazar, Sakti Tahsil And District Sakti (C.G.) 8 - Sangeeta Sahu W/o Neeraj Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Gopal Saw Mil, Budhwari Bazar, Sakti Tahsil And District Sakti (C.G.) 9 - Rupa Bai D/o Buddheshwar Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Gopal Saw Mil, Budhwari Bazar, Sakti Tahsil And District Sakti (C.G.) 10 - Vinita Sahu D/o Buddheshwar Sahu Aged About 46 Years R/o Gopal Saw Mil, Budhwari Bazar, Sakti Tahsil And District Sakti (C.G.). ---- Respondents 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondents-State : Ms. Vaishal Mahilong, PL. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 11.03.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as charge-sheet has been filed before the Court concerned. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-