Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 410 (CHH)

AKHILESHWAR PAINKRA v. SMT. AMRAWATI

MCC/1258/2025 · 2026-01-05

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1258 of 2025 • Akhileshwar Painkra S/o Kamta Prasad(Wrongly Mentioned Kamla In The Impugned Award) Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Kevri, Police Station And Tahsil Lakhanpur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh (Vehicle Driver) ... Applicant versus 1. Smt. Amrawati W/o Late Rajendra Painkra Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Palma, Police Station And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh (Claimant No. 1) 2. Chiranjiv S/o Late Rajendra Painkra Aged About 17 Years Minor, Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Amrawati, W/o Late Rajendra Painkra, R/o Village Palma, Police Station And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh (Claimant No. 2) 3. Sarvasati D/o Late Rajendra Painkra Aged About 13 Years Minor, Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Amrawati, W/o Late Rajendra Painkra, R/o Village Palma, Police Station And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh (Claimant No. 3) 4. Ravikumar S/o Late Rajendra Painkra Aged About 15 Years Minor, Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Amrawati, W/o Late Rajendra Painkra, R/o Village Palma, Police Station And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh (Claimant No. 4) 5. Bholaram S/o Late Jeeturam Painkra Aged About 67 Years R/o Village Palma, Police Station And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh (Claimant No. 5) 6. Smt. Ganeshwari W/o Bholaram Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Palma, Police Station And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 7. Tata A I G General Insurance Company Ltd. Branch Office, First Floor, 106- 07, Valfot Ozon, Bilaspur Road, Near Fafadeeh Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh (Insurer) 8. Chhatrapal Painkra S/o Bhondu Ram Painkra Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Harratikra, Police Station Manipur, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh (Vehicle Owner) ... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicant : Mr. Vikash Pandey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.01.06 14:14:47 +0530 2 06.01 .2026 1. The present application has been moved for restoration of MAC No. 1522 of 2025 which was dismissed on 25.09.2025. 2. Learned counsel for applicant would submit that on account of some unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear before this Court when the matter was taken up for hearing, therefore, MAC No. 1522 of 2025 was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would submit that the applicant/appellant is interested in pursuing the matter. He would pray to restore the appeal to its original number. 3. Taking into consideration the submissions made by Mr. Pandey, the instant MCC for restoration of MAC No. 1522 of 2025 is hereby allowed. The MAC No. 1522 of 2025 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- payable to Library Fund, High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur.. 4. Accordingly, the instant MCC is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant