- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6820 WP No. 103794 of 2014 C/W WP No. 104390 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO.103794 OF 2014 (LR) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 104390 OF 2014 IN WP NO.103794/2014: BETWEEN: SHRI SANJU GAJANAN VERNEKAR AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: DEVALIWADA, BAAD-581441, TALUK & DIST: KARWAR. …PETITIONER (BY SHRI ABHISHEK C. PATIL, SHRI AKSHAY A. KATTI, AND SHRI ANAND ASHTEKAR, ADVTS - ABSENT) AND: 1. SHRI SATISH DATTARAM REVANKAR SINCE DECEASED BY HIS L.RS. 1(A) SHRI. NUTAN W/O. SATISH REVANKAR AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. SONARWADA BAAD POST: NANDANGADDA – 581304 TALUK & DIST: KARWAR. 1(B) KUMARI SHEETAL D/O. SATISH REVANKAR AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: SONARWADA BAAD POST: NANDANGADDA-581304 TALUK & DIST: KARWAR. 1(C) SANDESH S/O. SATISH REVANKAR AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: SONARWADA BAAD Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6820 WP No. 103794 of 2014 C/W WP No. 104390 of 2014 POST: NANDANGADDA – 581304 TALUK & DIST: KARWAR. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KARWAR SUB DIVISION, KARWAR-581301. 3. SMT. LAXMI W/O. KRISHNA BAADKAR, AGE: 77 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. VAJANTRI WADA, BAAD – 2581441 TALUK & DIST: KARWAR. 4. SHRI RAMAKRISHNA VAMAN REVANKAR AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SONARWADA, BAADA POST: NANDANGADDA - 581304 TALUK & DIST: KARWAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI S. V. YAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 (A TO C); SHRI T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R2; PETITION AGAISNT RESPONDENT R3 – ABATED; NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.4 - SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 22.02.2013 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE IN APPEAL NO.370/2007 & 1311/2007 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D. IN WP NO.104390/2014 BETWEEN: SHRI RAMAKRISHNA VAMAN REVANKAR AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SONARWADA, BAAD POST: NANDANGADDA TALUK & DIST: KARWAR. …PETITIONER (BY SHRI MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADV.- ABSENT) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6820 WP No. 103794 of 2014 C/W WP No. 104390 of 2014 AND: 1. SHRI SATISH DATTARAM REVANKAR AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SONARWAD, BAAD POST: NANDANGADDA - 581304 TALUKA & DIST: KARWAR. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KARWAR, SUB-DIVISION, KARWAR – 581301. 3. SMT. LAKSHMI W/O. KRISHNA BAADKAR AGE: 77 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. VAJANTRI WADA, BAAD - 2581441 TALUKA & DIST: KARWAR. 4. SHRI SANJU GAJANAN VERNEKAR AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. DEVALIWADA, BAAD - 581441 TALUKA & DIST: KARWAR. …RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 3 – ABATED; SHRI T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R2; SHRI ABHISHEK C. PATIL, SHRI AKSHAY A. KATTI AND SHRI ANAD ASHTEKAR, ADV.S FOR R4 - ABSENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 22.02.2013 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE IN APPEAL NO.370/2007 AT ANNEXURE-D. THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6820 WP No. 103794 of 2014 C/W WP No. 104390 of 2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsels for the petitioners in both the writ petitions are absent. No representation, even when the matters were passed over thrice and again called at 2:46 p.m. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(c) in W.P.No.103794/2014 and learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.2 are present. 3. Order sheet dated 04.04.2025 reads as under: “Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time. Petition is of the year 2014. I do not find any reason to adjourn the mater. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to address the argument on the next date of hearing without fail. To afford final opportunity, list these matters finally, as a last chance, on 24.04.2025.” - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6820 WP No. 103794 of 2014 C/W WP No. 104390 of 2014 4. In spite of that, there is no representation. Therefore it is made clear that, the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petitions. Hence, writ petitions are dismissed for default i.e., for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE EM CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3