[2025:RJ-JP:41242] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15207/2025 Mahesh Kumar Verma S/o- Rambabu Verma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o-Village-Karwar, V.i.a-Indragarh, Dist-Bundi, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 2. The Secretary To The Government And Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Kota, Raj. 4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Itawa, Dist-Kota, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Dhuwan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/10/2025 1. This writ petition is filed in relation to directed recruitment on the post of LDC held vide advertisement dated 14.02.2013 and petitioner despite has joining in 2022, he was not given benefit of similarly placed candidates. 2. Although, in the writ petition, a direction is sought to the respondents to extend notional and other service benefits to the petitioner from the date similarly situated person(s) have been extended these benefits under the LDC Direct Recruitment, 2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be granted a liberty to submit representation(s) to the respondents for redressal of his grievances who may be directed to decide the [2025:RJ-JP:41242] (2 of 2) [CW-15207/2025] same expeditiously taking into consideration the order/judgment of this Court dated 18.07.2018 passed in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma and Others vs. State of Rajasthan and Others: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12109/2018. 3. In view of the nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and an order of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notice to the respondents: (i) The petitioner is at liberty to file representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievances within a period of four weeks from today. (ii) The respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt taking into consideration the order/judgment of this Court dated 18.07.2018 passed in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra) with communication of the decision to them. (iii) If the petitioner is found eligible and entitled for notional and other service benefits as paid to the similarly situated employees, the compliance shall be made within a period of 8 weeks from the date of taking the decision. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /61