Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40989 (AP)

Kondaveeti Ravi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7531/2024 · 2025-10-30

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010144122024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.7531 of 2024 Between: 1. KONDAVEETI RAVI, S/O RAJAIAH AGED 52 YEARS, OCC. PVT.EMPLOYEE R/O 305, VIJAYA TOWERS, 1ST LANE LAKSHMIPURAM, GUNTUR 2. KONDAVEETI FLORA MAGDALENE MARY, W/O KONDAVEETI RAVI AGED 47 YEARS OCC. NOT WORKING R/O 305, VIJAYA TOWERS,1ST LANE LAKSHMIPURAM, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT A P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, (THE CHIEF CONTROLLING AUTHORITY FOR THE REVENUE ADMINISTRATION) D.NO.189, 2ND FLOOR HIMAGNA TOWERS, N.T.R. MAARG, LIC COLONY, B-BLOCK, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 521225 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU, PALNADU DISTRICT 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDAKURAPADU GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 7. THE SUB REGISTRAR, SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE PEDAKURAPADU GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents not issuing the Digital Signature for the properties to an extent of Ac. 8.14 cents in Sy. No. 74-1, Ac. 0.16 cents in Sy. No. 74-2 and Ac. 0.16 cents in Sy. No. 75-2 of 75-Thalluru Village of Pedakurapadu Mandal, Guntur district by taking consideration of orders passed by the court of the Revision Authority and Joint Collector and Addl.District Magistrate Guntur in Rc.No.l27/2022-D2 dated 27.04.2023, as illegal arbitrary unjust violation of principles of natural justice guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to issue Digital Signature to the said properties and Revoke the land from Dispute records from Revenue Records in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter in the Registry stating that he has received instructions from the writ petitioners to withdraw the present Writ Petition and hence he sought permission of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition and he also endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 31.10.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.7531 of 2024 Date: 31.10.2025 siva