Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40987 (PNJ)

ANSHUL KHURANA AND OTHERS v. PARVEEN KUMAR

CWP/9341/2025 · 2025-04-02

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-9341-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 123 ANSHUL KHURANA AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The the respondents to with the effect from the date their juniors have been appointed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropria stage, the petitioner to decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Rohit Arya respondents/State by the second respondent 5. In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to Education, to consider and decide the pending 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: ANSHUL KHURANA AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondents to grant the benefit of notional pay fixation with the effect from the date their juniors have been appointed. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case the to decide the pending legal notice, dated 20.12 specified period. Notice of motion. Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, accepts notice respondents/State and submits that the pending second respondent expeditiously. In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent/ to consider and decide the pending IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9341-2025 Date of Decision: 02.04.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA seeking a writ of mandamus directing grant the benefit of notional pay fixation to the petitioners with the effect from the date their juniors have been appointed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised te decision before the respondents. At this the second respondent is directed 20.12.2024, Annexure P-6, in a , accepts notice on behalf of the submits that the pending legal notice shall be decided In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition second respondent/Director, Elementary to consider and decide the pending legal notice, dated 20.12.2024, directing to the petitioners that grievance raised te decision before the respondents. At this is directed , in a on behalf of the shall be decided In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition Director, Elementary , Aman Dua 2025.04.03 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-9341-2025 by passing a speaking order in months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. 6. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 02.04.2025 Ad 2025 -2- by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No accordance with law, within a period of three In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.04.03 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document