Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:44733-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 478 of 2025 1 - Harish Ganjir S/o Late Mr. Udhoram Ganjir Aged About 41 Years Convicted Prisoner No. 3921/46, R/o Ward No. 13 Gunderdehi, Post Gunderdehi Police Station- Gunderdehi, District- Balod (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Jail Superintendent Central Jail, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - District Magistrate Balod, District- Balod (C.G.) 4 - Superintendent Of Police Balod, District- Balod (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Veer Verma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.09.03 10:38:55 +0530
2
Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 02.09.2025
1. Heard Mr. Veer Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri S.S. Baghel, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State.
2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:-
“That the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (i) Call for entire record pertaining to the case of the petitioner. (ii) Quash the impugned order dated 01/07/2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent no. 3 and
order may kindly be passed for temporary release/parole of the petitioner for 14 + 2 days. (iii) To grant any other relief which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice..”
3. The order impugned in the present petition is only the recommendation made by the Superintendent of Police, District Balod on 01.07.2025 to the District Magistrate.
3 However, the actual order passed by the District Magistrate rejecting the petitioner’s parole application has neither been challenged in this petition nor placed on record to which
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh.
4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.).
5. Certified copy (Annexure P/1) may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Shoaib