APHC010379352024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3581/2024 Between: 1. K.NARASIMHULU, S/O.K.CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.62/17, FORT AREA, NEAR OLD BUS STAND, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. J NIVAS IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC MD/CEO, THE ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRE FOR FINANCIAL SYSTEMS AND SERVICES (APCFSS), 6TH FLOOR, C BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. V DIWAKAR REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, GUDUR NAGAR PANCHAYAT GUDUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. CHANDRA MOHAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. C B SWAMY SHEKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC PAY AND ACCOUNTSOFFICER WORKS AND PROJECTS, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully and intentionally disobeying the order dated 09.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.39928 of 2022 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to discharge me from the Contempt of Court proceedings in the CC.No.3581/2024 against this respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 3. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA The Court made the following Order: The both learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and the respondents submit that, the order under contempt has already been complied with. 2. In view of the same, this contempt case is closed, as no cause survives. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 14.11.2025 NNN