SUNIL SHIVAJI SUTAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
IA/2343/2025 · 2025-10-07
Shri Shivkumar Dige
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40984 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40984 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
P-IA-2343-2025 speaking.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2343 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 205 OF 2025 Sunil Shivaji Sutar …. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. …. Respondents ----- Mr. Rahul B. Khot, Advocate for the Applicant. Dr. A. A. Takalkar , A.P.P., for the Respondent – State. Mr. Aditya S. Ghatge, appointed Advocate through Legal Aid for Respondent No.2. -----
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2025.
P.C. :
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. This praecipe is moved by learned counsel for Respondent No.2 for speaking to the minutes of order dated 7th October, 2025.
3.
Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that this Court allowed interim application on 7th October, 2025. The said
order did not record his name. He was appointed on 29th September,
2025. He was present in the Court on 7th October, 2025. Hence, Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2025.10.14 12:31:57 +0530
P-IA-2343-2025 speaking.doc requested his appearance to be recorded in the appearance part of the
order.
4. Considering the submission of learned counsel for Respondent No.2, appearance of Mr. Aditya S. Ghatge for Respondent No.2 be shown in the order dated 7th October, 2025. Consequently the clause of professional fees of Rs.10,000/- be mentioned in the order.
5. Necessary correction be carried out in the original order and corrected order be uploaded on the official website.
6. In view of above, the praecipe stands disposed off.
( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2