1 2025:CGHC:44541 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4662 of 2025 Shankar Lal Agrawal S/o Harphool Agrawal, Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Chandrakhuri, Block Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Information Commission Through Chhattisgarh State Information Commissioner, Office At Sector-19, North Block, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - First Appellate Officer, District Education Officer, Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.) 3 - Public Information Officer/ Block Education Officer, Block Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate For Information Commission : Mr. Shayam Sunder Lal Tekchandani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 02/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, petitioner sought following relief(s) : VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.09.03 11:03:44 +0530 2 “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 for early disposal of the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner as early as possible within period of 30 days. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court kindly further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide the true copy of documents as demanded by the petitioner in his application filed under Right to Information Act (mentioned in Anneuxre P-1). 10.3 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that by way of this petition, the petitioner is not challenging the contents of the order, which have been passed/written, but seeking the direction to the respondent No.1 for early disposal of the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner as early as possible within period of 30 days. The petitioner also seeks direction to provide the true copy of documents as mentioned in the Annexure P-1 as demanded by the petitioner from the office of respondent No.3. 3. Learned State counsel contended that the concerned authority is ready to consider and decide the appeal of the petitioner as per law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts of the case and submission made by counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing 3 to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with rules, regulations and law. If there is no legal impediment. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant