MOHAMMAD YUSUB KHAN S/O LATE USMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12986/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40979 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40979 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41341] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12986/2025 Mohammad Yusub Khan S/o Late Usman, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Nagla Shyam (Bholu Ka Nagla) Police Station Nagar, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/10/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.191/2024 registered at Police Station Nagar, District-Deeg for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 319(2), 317(5), 303(2), 313 and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and no recovery has been affected from his possession. The co-accused-Munfed, Javed, Varis, Mahir, Sahil, Tarif, Aarif have already been granted bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court. He submits that the other co- accused-Shahjad has been released on bail by this Court on
[2025:RJ-JP:41341] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12986/2025]
15.05.2025. The case of the present petitioner is similar to that of other co-accused. The petitioner is behind the Bar since
12.09.2025. Therefore, on the ground of the parity, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Mohammad Yusub Khan S/o Late Usman shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/5