1 2025:CGHC:22323 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6756 of 2024 Bhumika Tiwari W/o Manoj Tiwari Aged About 40 Years Working As Headmaster Posted At Primary School Bhulsibhawna Madanpur Block Poudi Uprora, District Korba (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department Of Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Director Directorate Public Instructions Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Korba District- Korba (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer, Korba District Korba (C.G.) 5 - Block Education Officer Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Bushra Shehnaz, Headmaster, Primary School, Ompur, Block Korba, District -Korba (C.G.) 7 - Ram Kumar Patel, Headmaster, Government Primary School Gorraduggu, Block Korba, District Korba (C.G). ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents No.1 -5/State : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 22.05.2025 VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.05.22 16:22:08 +0530 2 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the earlier round of litigation, the petitioner was directed to file a representation for redressal of her grievance. She filed a representation, however, the representation has been dismissed ignoring the similar order passed in respect of the similarly situated persons. Learned counsel further submits that the concerned respondents authorities may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner afresh in accordance with Annexures P-8 & P-9 annexed with this writ petition by which the similarly situated persons have been given relief which the petitioner is claiming. 2) Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation stating all the above things along with a copy of this writ petition and in turn respondent No.4 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the submissions made above as well as Annexures P-8 & P-9 and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 3) With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.o4 is directed to consider the case of the \ Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Vasant