Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40972 (AP)

SADASIVUNI SRINIVASA RAO v. M RAVI CHANDRA

CC(AT)/7/2025 · 2025-12-03

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010311982024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE (A.T.) NO: 7 of 2025 Between: SADISIVUNI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE NANAJI RAO, AGED 54 YEARS, OFFICE SUBORDINATE, TRIBAL WELFARE SUB-DIVISION, MANDASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. M. RAVI CHANDRA, I.A.S, SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. B. NAGESH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DISTRICT TREASUR, SRIKAKULAM. 3. MR. PRASAD, ASSISTANT TREASURY OFFICER, SUB- TREASURY, PALAKONDA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. K. ASHOK, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRIBAL WELFARE, SITHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 4-7-2018 of the Tribunal, in O.A.No.1280 of 2018 and to punish the respondents for violating the orders of the Tribunal. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): K. RAVI, Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M. ESWAR BRAHMANAND The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.07.2018 in O.A.No.1280 of 2018 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad. 2. Sri Munduru Eswar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J Date: 04.12.2025 KSN/RMR 342 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE (A.T.) No.7 of 2025 Date: 04.12.2025 KSN/RMR