Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4096 (CHH)

DEEPESH KHARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/437/2025 · 2025-04-01

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2025:CGHC:15345 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 437 of 2025 1 Deepesh Khare S/o Late Prabhat Khare Aged About 45 Years Presently Working As Assistant Veterinary Field Office At Veterinary Dispensary Pod District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Veterinary Development Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 Uder Secretary Veterinary Development Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 Director Veterinary Services Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Shri Suyashdhar, Dy. G.A. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.02 11:45:39 +0530 2 / 3 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 01.04.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, is questioning the transfer order dated 08.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) by which the petitioner has been transferred from Veterinary Dispensary Pod, Raipur to Veterinary Dispensary Dumarkhola, Dist Balrampur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner’s daughter is studying in Class 3rd at Raipur and his mother is also not well and undergone surgery of gallbladder. He further refers to Director of School Education, Madras and Ors. Vs. O. Karuppa Thevan and Anr. Reported in 1994 Supp (2) SCC 666 wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court deprecated the system of transfer of employees in mid session where their children are studying. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents/ State on instructions submits that, as far as, the transfer of employees of the State government is concerned, the State government has decided to constitute a committee to consider the grievance of the employees in case of transfer and placed a copy of the order dated 03.03.2025, which is taken on record. He further submits that if the petitioner will approach the said committee, the committee will decide the same in accordance with the relevant transfer policy and relevant law. 3 / 3 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on record and the judgment of the Hon’ble supreme court which is placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Hence, looking to the grievance of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall approach the committee constituted by order dated 03.03.2025 with a representation within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case of filing of the representation, the said committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and policy of State government within a period of 30 days from the date of filing of the representation. Till the decision of the committee, the interim order dated 17.01.2025 shall remain operative. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the committee about the order of this court. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Jyoti