Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40958 (KAR)

MR. RAJEEVI v. THE BRANCH MANAGER

WP/18234/2025 · 2025-10-17

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41460 WP No. 18234 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 18234 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. RAJEEVI W/O N. VENKAPPA., AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. 2. MR. N. VENKAPPA, S/O BALANNA KUMBARA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. BOTH THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT: #7-27/1/2, NISHMITHA NILAYA, KAKKARABETTU HOUSE, UJIRE, D.K. - 574 240 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., UJIRE, D.K - 574240. 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., MANGALURU - 575 003. 3. THE SALE OFFICER, BELTHANGADY- KARKALA ZONE, SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KODIALBAIL, MANGALURU - 575 003. Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41460 WP No. 18234 of 2025 4. SMT. VIDYA, W/O YOGISH ACHARYA, MAJOR, R/AT 34-2, POORJI, DHARMASTHALA VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADI TALUK - 574 240 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAKSHITH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R2 & 3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED AUCTION SALE PROCEEDINGS AND SALE DATED 24.04.2025 HELD BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT NO.4 AS PER ANNEXURE-A DAVA NO.102/2020-21, CEP NO.879/2021-22. AND II) DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENTS TO OBTAIN VALUATION REPORT FROM AUTHORIZED VALUATOR AND FIX RESERVE PRICE OF THE PROPERTY AND THEN PROCEED TO AUCTION THE PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the condition imposed vide order dated 24.07.2025 could not be complied with. Under such circumstances, the petition has rendered infructuous. Submission is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41460 WP No. 18234 of 2025 Hence, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SPV CT:VS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 9