Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40956 (CHH)

SMT. NEELAM TANDAN v. SATWANTIN BAI

MAC/1860/2018 · 2025-07-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37685 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1860 of 2018 1 - Smt. Neelam Tandan W/o Late Kanhaiya Tandan, Aged About 38 Years R/o. Village Budgaon, Tahsil Doundilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh..............(Respondent No. 2), District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Kantibai Deshlahare W/o Santosh Deshlahare, Aged About 33 Years R/o. Near Jay Sambh (Behind Ram Hardware Traders), Ward No. 31, Rajeev Nagar Lakholi, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh................(Respondent No. 3), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Satwantin Bai W/o Devnarayan Thakur, Aged About 39 Years Caste Halba, R/o. Village Badgaon, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh..............(Claimant), District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 2 - Kulesh Kumar Thakur, S/o Devnarayan Thakur, Aged About 20 Years Caste Halba, R/o. Village Badgaon, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh..............(Claimant), District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Bhumika D/o. Late Devnarayan Thakur, Aged About 18 Years Caste Halba, R/o. Village Badgaon, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh..............(Claimant), District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Bahuri Bai W/o Late Mangal Singh, Aged About 65 Years Caste Halba, R/o. Village Badgaon, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh..............(Claimant), District : Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.08.02 14:33:43 +0530 2 Balod, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chandrashekhar S/o Late Badalraj, Aged About 24 Years Caste Satnami, R/o. Village Badgaon, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh..............(Respondent No. 1), District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None For Respondents : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 31/07/2025 1. No one appeared for the appellants on the last two dates, i.e., 10.7.2025 and 23.7.2025. Today also, no one appeared for the appellants even in the second round of call, as such the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh