- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41397 RFA NO.154 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.154 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI G. PRABHAKAR S/O A. GURUMURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. 2. SRI. G. SHUBHAKAR S/O A. GURUMURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3. SRI. G. MADHUKAR S/O A. GURUMURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT: SAMASANDRA PALYA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, ST. JOHN'S MEDICAL COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 034. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SUNIL PATIL, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. MR. RIYAZ AHMED SHARIFF S/O LATE AZEEZ SHARIFF, AGE: MAJOR. 2. MR. MAAZ AHMED SHARIFF S/O LATE AXEEX SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDIG AT NO.548, 8TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 34. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41397 RFA NO.154 OF 2014 3. M/S. PURVANKARA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS PURUVANKARA PROJECTS LTD.) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING REGD. OFFICE AT: NO.103/1, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042. REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY / REPRESENTATIVE MR. B. PRAVEEN KUMAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SANJAY NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. ABHILASH RAJU V., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI, RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28TH OCTOBER, 2013 PASSED IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.990 OF 1997 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation for appellants. 2. Perusal of the order sheet would indicate that, on previous two occasions also none appeared for appellants. In - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41397 RFA NO.154 OF 2014 that view of the matter, I am of the view that, appellants are not interested to prosecute the appeal. 3. Therefore, Regular First Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14