APHC010574532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29919/2025 Between: 1. CHIRRI AGGAMMA, AGE 48YRS, W/O BAJI RAO, R/O D.NO.3-107, MAIN ROAD, CHANDRAMMA COLONY PALACHERLA RAJAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLAVARAM DIVISION, POLAVARAM. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JEELUGUMILLI CIRCLE, JEELUGUMILLI. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JEELUGUMILLI POLICE STATION, JEELUGUMILLI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents in not taking action on the complaint made by the petitioner on 11/10/2025 against the criminal trespass and destruction of crops resulting in a loss of Rs.3,00,000/- caused by Jala Seetharamudu and others for the land covered in R.S.51/IP an extent of Ac.S.OOCents situated in Jeelugumilli Village and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the complaint made by the petitioner on 11/10/2025” 2 2. Heard Sri J.Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the representation of the petitioner has been received and, upon enquiry, it was found that the subject matter is civil in nature. Therefore, no crime has been registered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently opposed the said submissions, contending that it is a tribal area, the question of any civil dispute does not arise. 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.11.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29919 of 2025 Dt.06.11.2025 Asr