Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40943 (RAJ)

VISHAMBER DAYAL S/O RAMJILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/343/2025 · 2025-10-10

Inderjeet Singh, Shubha Mehta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41250-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 343/2025 Vishamber Dayal S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Jindoli, Police Station Tatarpur, Tehsil Mundawar, District Khairthal Tijara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Khairthal Tijara. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Tatarpur, District Khairthal Tijara. 4. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking, Jaipur. 5. Subin S/o Pappu Khan, R/o Ghati Bas, Chandoli, Vijay Mandir, Alwar, Rajasthan 6. Aas Mohammad S/o Namalum, R/o Ghati Bas Chandoli, Vijay Mandir, Alwar, Rajasthan. 7. Irfan Khan S/o Namalum, R/o Nagal Tappa Laxmangarh, Alwar Rajasthan. 8. Unnas S/o Namalum, R/o Nagal Tappa Laxmangarh, Alwar Rajasthan 9. Ashif S/o Namalum, R/o Mehrana, Laxamngarh, Alwar Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Jaswant Singh, SI, Police Station Tatarpur Distt. Khairthal, Tijara HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 10/10/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:41250-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-343/2025] 1. Heard. 2. The corpus, on having been recovered, has been produced today before this Court by Mr. Jaswant Singh, SI, Police Station Tatarpur Distrit Khairthal, Tijara. The date of birth of the corpus as reflected from the record is 04.05.2009, meaning thereby the corpus is minor, below 18 years of age, which is affirmed by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned GA-cum-AAG. 3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has stated before this Court that she wants to go and live with the petitioner i.e. father of the corpus. 4. Considering the statement made by the corpus before us and also considering the fact that the corpus is a minor, below 18 years of age, therefore, we give liberty to the corpus to go and live with the petitioner i.e. her father. The concerned Police Officer is directed that no harm should be caused by any person to the corpus. 5. In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /58