SANJAY SAWAIYAN ALIAS SANJU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/1306/2025 · 2025-11-21
Gautam Kumar Choudhary, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40930 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40930 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:34809-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1306 of 2025
Sanjay Sawaiyan @ Sanju, aged about 35 years, son of late Ashok Sawaiyan, resident of Raidih Basti, Ambedkar Nagar, Adityapur, P.O. and P.S. Adityapur, District- Seraikella Kharsawan ... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Respondent
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Appellant
: Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State
: Mr. P.K. Mishra, A.P.P.
---
Order No. 05/ Dated: 21st November, 2025
I.A. No. 14436 of 2025
Heard Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned A.P.P.
2. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 07 days in filing the appeal.
3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 07 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
4. I.A. No. 14436 of 2025 stands disposed of. Cr. A.(DB) No. 1306 of 2025
5. This appeal is directed against the order dated 29.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Seraikella in connection with M.C.R.A. No. 867 of 2025 arising out of Adityapur P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024, whereby and where under the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
6. It has been alleged that a bottle bomb was thrown in the car of the informant which resulted in the informant receiving some injuries.
7. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that he has been implicated on the confessional statement of the co-accused. Learned counsel submits that the appellant is in custody since 12.08.2024 and since charge has recently been framed, there is no chance of the trial being concluded in the near future.
8. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has submitted that the appellant has got several criminal antecedents.
2025:JHHC:34809-DB
2
9. On consideration of the period of custody undergone by the appellant and the manner of his implication, we while setting aside the order dated 29.07.2025 passed in M.C.R.A. No. 867 of 2025 arising out of Adityapur P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Seraikella direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Seraikella, subject to the condition that the appellant shall remain physically present before the learned Trial Court on each and every date till the conclusion of the Trial Court.
10. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 21st November, 2025
Vedanti/-Aditi/-