APHC010436052022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26754/2022 Between: 1. KOVI SUBBARAO, S/O KRISHNAIAH,AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,OCC. BUSSINESS, R/O RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, BALAYAPALLI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANAGALAGIRI. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI. 5. MR N NAGAMALLESHWARA RAO, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VENKATAGIRI, NOW TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. MR P NARASIMHA RAO, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE DAKKILI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. NOW TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 7. J TIRUMAL RAO, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE BALAYAPALLI POLICE STATION, BALAYAPALLI TIRUPATI DISTRICT, NOW TRANSFERED TO D.V.SATRAM POLICE STATION,TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. PETA GNANA TEJA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more je nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent No.2 to 4 herein in taking disciplinary action against the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 herein for adopting illegal methods of foisting a false criminal case and causing huge monetary loss to the tune of Rs. 6,00,000/- , inspite of the written complaint dt 25-7-2022, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and colourable exercise of powers and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein to initiate departmental action against the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in accordance with Law, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Heard Sri G.Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a direction may be given to the respondent-police to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate decision over the matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent No.4 is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate decision over the matter in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.11.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26754 of 2022 Dt.07.11.2025 Asr