Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40921 (RAJ)

GAURAV SHARMA SON OF SURENDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/204/2025 · 2025-12-09

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49934] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.204/2025 1. Gaurav Sharma Son Of Surendra Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ward No.-14, Sitaram Mandir Ke Paas, Sedulaai Colony, Talaai Ke Paar, Lalsot, Dist.-Dausa Rajasthan. 2. Surendra Sharma Son Of Namaloom, Resident Of Ward No.-14, Sitaram Mandir Ke Paas, Sedulaai Colony, Talaai Ke Paar, Lalsot, Dist.-Dausa Rajasthan. 3. Shiwani Sharma Daughter Of Surendra Sharma, Resident Of Ward No.-14, Sitaram Mandir Ke Paas, Sedulaai Colony, Talaai Ke Paar, Lalsot, Dist.-Dausa Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Dhiraj Agarwal S/o Subhash Agarwal, Aged About 44 Years, Chief Operating Officer Of Ms. Truworth Health Technology Pvt. Ltd. 4Th Floor, Reliance Mart Building, Vaishali Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/12/2025 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned FIR No.5/2025 registered with Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 306 BNS, 2023. 2. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court that after thorough investigation from all four corners, the Police did not find involvement of petitioner Nos.2 & 3 in the alleged [2025:RJ-JP:49934] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-204/2025] incident, but the involvement of the petitioner No.1-Gaurav Sharma was found to be proved, who has met with an accident on 12.02.2025 and has expired at SMS Hospital, Jaipur during the course of treatment, therefore, a negative final report for the reasons of death of an accused has been submitted. Hence, under the changed circumstances, the instant criminal misc. petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) stand disposed of. 4. The factual report so furnished by the learned Public Prosecutor is ordered to be retained on the record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/20