Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40915 (PNJ)

KRISHAN PAL v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/17675/2025 · 2025-07-10

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17675-2025 DECIDED ON: 10.07.2025 KRISHAN PAL .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.93 dated 17.03.2025 under Sections 115, 190, 191(2), 351(3) of BNSS, 2023 (Sections 117(2), 333 of BNS, 2023 added later on) registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar, District Faridabad, Haryana. This Court vide order dated 01.04.2025, while issuing notice of motion granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation. Reply filed by way of an affidasvit of Mahesh Kumar, HPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ballabgarh, District Faridabad, is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 01.04.2025, the petitioner has joined the investigation. MEENU 2025.07.11 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-17675-2025 -2- Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and on instructions further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. In view of the above, the order dated 01.04.2025 is made absolute. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 10.07.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.07.11 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document