IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 201 FAO-M-240-M-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2025 SINDER KAUR ..Appellant Versus JARNAIL SINGH ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: None. * * * * ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (Oral) 1. On 13.03.2023, the following order was passed:- “As per office report, fresh address of respondent has not been supplied due to which notice could not be issued to respondent. Needful be done by learned counsel for the appellant within three weeks. Pursuant thereto, fresh notice be issued to the respondent, for 02.08.2023. Learned counsel for the appellant be notified of this order.” 2. On 09.10.2023, the following order was passed:- “As per office report, notice could not be issued for want of correct address. Last opportunity is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to file correct address of the respondent within two weeks. On doing so, let fresh notice be issued to the respondent for 16.01.2024. Let a final intimation be circulated to the office of Mr. S.S. Sodhi, Advocate for the appellant through E-mail.” 3. On 22.07.2024, the following order was passed:- “No one appeared. Court notice be issued, for the personal appearance of the present appellant and of the respondent before this Court, for the date fixed. List on 21.11.2024.” MOHD AYUB 2025.07.11 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-M-240-M-2004 (O&M) -2- 4. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 5. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in prosecuting the appeal. 6. Hence, dismissed for non-prosecution. 7. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) July 10th, 2025 JUDGE Ayub Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.07.11 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.