1 APHC010622572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32154/2025 Between: 1. PUJARI SUDHAKARA, S/O PUJARI VENKATESH, AGE 42YEARS, CULTIVATION R/O. BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTHAVARIPALLI POST, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOR DISTRICT. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNGANUR, CHITTOR DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUNGANUR POLICE STATION, CHITTOR DISTRICT. 5. GORRELA VENKATRAMANA, S/O LATE G NARASAPPA AGE 70 YEARS R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT. 6. GORRELLA JAGANNTHAM, S/O GORRELA VENKATRAMANA AGE 45 YEARS R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT 7. GORRELA TRIMURTHY, S/O GORRELA VENKATARAMANA, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT 8. GORRELA ADINARAYANA, S/O NALLA NAGAPPA AGED 60 YEAS R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT 9. GORRELA RAVI KUMAR, S/O G SUBBANNA AGED 42 YEARS, R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT 2 10. C NARASIMHULU, S/O C REDDAPPA AGE 57 YEARS, R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT 11. DUDYALA NAGARAJA, S/O CHINNA SWAMY AGED 57 YEARS, R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT 12. D GANGI REDDY, S/O D VENKATRAMANA AGED 42 R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE, MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT. YEARS 13. G GANGIREDDY, S/O ADINARAYANA AGED 40 YEARS, R/O BARINEPALLI VILLAGE MITTACHINTAVRIPALLI, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VINODIN RUTH MADAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ or direction, especially on in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2 to 4 respondents particularly herein nonfiling of charge sheet, in crime FIR no 13/2024 dated 09-01-2024 is arbitrary, violation of Principle of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent authorities to complete investigation and to file charge sheet and for other reliefs.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the investigation is completed in this matter and the case is referred as “FALSE”. 3 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 20.11.2025 ASR 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32154 of 2025 Dt..20.11.2025 ASR