Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40910 (JHR)

MDV RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY DEEPAK TIBREWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./326/2023 · 2025-12-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:36064 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 326 of 2023 ------ 1. MDV Resources Private Limited, currently has its registered office at 515, DLF Galleria, Block BG-8, Action Area IB, P.O. & P.S.-New Town, Kolkata-700156, West Bengal through its Authorized Signatory Deepak Tibrewal, s/o Ram Gopal Tibrewal, aged about 58 years, r/o Flat No. C2M, Sneha Garden, 28, Ray Bahadur Road, Jora Shiv Mandir, Behala East, P.O. & P.S.-New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal-700053 2. Vivek Ojha, s/o Devendra Kumar Ojha, aged about 38 years, TATA Avenida, Flat No. 2501, Tower-F, Action Area -2, P.O. & P.S.-New Town Action Area III, Dist.-North 24 Parganas, West Bengal-700160 3. Vaibhav Ojha @ Vaibhav, s/o Devendra Kumar Ojha, aged about 32 years, TATA Avenida, Flat No. 2501, Tower-F, Action Area -2, P.O. & P.S.-New Town Action Area III, Dist.- North 24 Parganas, West Bengal-700160 4. Ankita Upadhyay @ Priyanka Upadhyay, daughter of Kedernath Upadhyay, aged about 32 yrs., residing at 23/24 Rameshwar Malia Lane, P.O.+P.S.-Howrah, Dist.-Howradh- 711101 .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari, s/o late Lal Mohan Tiwari, r/o Raj Tower, Near Kamal Katesaria School, P.O. & P.S.-Nag Nagar, P.S.-Barwadda, Dist.-Dhanbad .... .... .... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner s : None For the State : Mr. Bhola N. Ojha, Spl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocate ------ Order No.06 Dated- 02.12.2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners’ in-spite of repeated calls. Learned Spl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this criminal miscellaneous petition as there is no merit in this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 02.12.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-