- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5124 WP No. 101479 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101479 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. BHANUDAS R. MEHARWADE, AGE: 78 YEARS, R/O: NO. 54, VISHWESHWAR NAGAR, HUBLI-580 032, BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SHRI. VITTAL S/O BHANUDAS MEHARWADE, AGE: 49 YEARS, R/O: HUBBALLI-580 032. 2. DATTA S/O MOHANDAS HABIB, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NO.196, BELAGAVI GALLI, HUBBALLI-580 008. 3. SMT. ASHWINI DATTA HABIB, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NO.196, BELAGAVI GALLI, HUBBALLI-580 008. 4. ARYAN DATTA HABIB, AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NO.196, BELAGAVI GALLI, HUBBALLI-580 008. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.M. SHEELVANT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. HUBLI DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HUBBALLI, BY ITS COMMISSIONER-580 023. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ZONAL OFFICE NO.9, HUBBALLI DHARWAD, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5124 WP No. 101479 of 2025 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HUBBALLI-580 008. 3. SMT. PREMA MURLIDHAR, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: C/O ALANKAR KAMAT HOTEL, DAJIBAN PET, HUBBALLI-580 008. 4. RAVINDRA AMBASA GUDI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: DAJIBAN PET, HUBBALLI-580 008. 5. ANAND KAMATAGI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, M/S GANGAVATI SILK SAREES, DAJIBANPET, HUBBALLI-580 008. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.I. GACHHINAMATH, ADVOCATE R1-R2; SRI. PRAKASH K. JAWALKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING- INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.V.M.Sheelavant., counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Prakash K.Jawalkar., counsel for respondent No.4 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5124 WP No. 101479 of 2025 When queried, counsel Sri.V.M.Sheelavant., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH/MRP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 46.1