[2025:RJ-JP:41257] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4282/2012 1. Ratan Lal S/o Shri Mangilal, R/o Village Bhaisawa, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur, presently R/o 17, Braj Mandal Colony, Kalwar Road, Jaipur. 2. Kamla Devi W/o Ratanlal, R/o Village Bhaisawa, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur, Presently R/o 17, Braj Mandal Colony, Kalwar Road, Jaipur. ---Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan-through public prosecutor. 2. Bank of Baroda, Branch Ambabari, Jaipur through Manager 3. Vishnu Singh Son of Bhanwar Singh, R/o Karauli District Karauli Rajasthan 4. Smt. Seema Upreeti W/o Tapeshwar, R/o Plot No.22, Laxmi Nagar, Harnathpura, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur. 5. Saraswati Devi W/o Ghanshyam Bishnoi, R/o 56-A, Kala Nagri, Govindpura, Kalwar Road, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Shukla, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Ms. Rekha Jain, Adv. for Ms. Kriti Kapoor, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 10/10/2025 1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash and set aside FIR No.193/2011 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur City (North) for alleged offence under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, which was lodged by Dena Bank. 2. It is submitted that there was some dispute with regard to outstanding loan amount, and the said amount has been repaid [2025:RJ-JP:41257] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-4282/2012] by the accused-petitioners, which has also been verified by learned counsel for the complainant-Bank. 3. It is further submitted that after satisfaction of the loan amount, compromise has been entered into between the accused- petitioners and complainant-Bank. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has also submitted one factual report dated 09.10.2025 prepared by S.H.O., Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur City (North), which reveals that after satisfaction of the loan amount, complainant and accused have entered into compromise and Bank does not want to prosecute the accused-petitioners further. 5. The factual report dated 09.10.2025 is taken on record. 6. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in the light of compromise entered into between the parties and as per the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, the impugned FIR may be quashed and set aside. 7. Learned counsel for the complainant has no objection in case, the impugned FIR is quashed on the basis of compromise. 8. Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 9. Bare perusal of the FIR would make it clear that only dispute appears to be with regard to settlement of loan amount and as per the factual report submitted by learned Public Prosecutor as well as on the basis of statements made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as complainant, it has come out that after satisfaction of the loan amount, there is no [2025:RJ-JP:41257] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-4282/2012] further dispute between the parties and they have entered into compromise. 10. In the light of foregoing discussion as well as guidelines laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Gian Singh (supra) and this Court deems it just and proper to quash and set aside the FIR No.193/2011 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur City (North). 11. The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 12. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /6