[2025:RJ-JP:41369] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15631/2025 Anees Mohammed S/o Nafees Mohammed, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Deori, Shahbad, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. 2. The Zonal Chief Engineer (Kz), Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited, Kota. 3. The Superintendent Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited, Baran. 4. The Assistant Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Vidyut Nigam Limited, Shahabad, District Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 27.02.2024 in case of Sharwan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2938/2024 submits that a Coordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur has considered an identical issue, wherein a low paid employee was transferred from one District to another, and granted stay order. He submits that present petitioner is working on the post of Technical Helper Gr.II and is transferred from Shahbad, District Baran to Hindauli, District Bundi. He referred family circumstances of present [2025:RJ-JP:41369] (2 of 3) [CW-15631/2025] petitioner and submits that case of Sharwan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) and Connected matters were decided by a Coordinate Bench on 14.02.2025 at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, wherein the respondents are directed to balanced the exigencies against employee rights and service rules vis-a-vis humanitarian consideration in deserving cases. He submits that petitioner has not joined at new place and he is entitled for interim protection till his representation is decided by the respondent-Department in according of principal of law laid down by this Hon’ble Court in case of Sharwan Kumar Vs. State (supra). 2. Having considered submission of learned counsel for petitioner and also on perusal of material placed on record along with judgments as referred by learned counsel for petitioner, it is apparent on record that petitioner, who was working as Technical Helper Gr.II at Shahbad (Baran) was transferred to Hindauli (Bundi). 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of two weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation in light of judgment as referred hereinabove. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:41369] (3 of 3) [CW-15631/2025] 4. In the meanwhile, the petitioner may be continued at old place of posting till disposal of the representation of the petitioner, if the post at old place Shabad (Baran) is lying vacant. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /27