Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40900 (AP)

BOLLIPALLI SREERAM CHOWDARY v. NALLIBOINA BHANU TEJA

CRP/1263/2025 · 2025-11-13

K Suresh Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010098812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1263/2025 Between: 1. BOLLIPALLI SREERAM CHOWDARY, S/O. SRINIVASULU NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O. D.NO. 16- 720, SRIRAM NAGAR COLONY, PANAGAL, SRIKALAHASTI TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. NALLIBOINA BHANU TEJA, S/O. SRINIVASULU, HDINDU, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS. MINOR. 2. NALLIBOINA KARTHIK S/O. SREENIVASULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS. MINOR. (1STAND 2ND RESPONDENTS BEING MINORS REP. BY THEIR MOTHER NALLIBOINA SUNEETHA, R/O. THURUPU VEEDHI, MANUBOLU VILLAGE POST, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 524405). 2. NALLIBOINA KARTHIK, S/O. SREENIVASULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS. MINOR. (1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS BEING MINORS REP. BY THEIR MOTHER NALLIBOINA SUNEETHA, R/O. THURUPU VEEDHI, MANUBOLU VILLAGE POST, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 524405). 3. NALLIBOINA HANSIKA, D/O. NALLIBOINA RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, HINDU, MINOR, REP. BY HER MOTHER NALLIBOINA KESAVARDHINI, 2 R/O. THURUPU VEEDHI, MANUBOLU VILLAGE POST, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. NALLIBOINA SREENITHA KRISHNA, S/O. NALLIBOINA RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, HINDU, MINOR, REP. BY HER MOTHER NALLIBOINA KESAVARDHINI, R/O. THURUPU VEEDHI, MANUBOLU VILLAGE POST, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. VEDICHERLA SRAVANTHI, W/O. VEDICHERLA SIVA KUMAR, D/O. SAMADHI SRILAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. CHALIVENDRA VILLAGE, MUTHUKUR MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. SAMADHI SANDHYA, D/O. SAMADHI BHASKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, HINDU R/O. THURUPU VEEDHI, MANUBOLU VILLAGE, POST, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. NALLIBOINA LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, W/O. LATE GOPALAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. 8. NALLIBOINA SRINIVASULU, . S/O. LATE GOPALAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 9. NALLIBOINA SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. LATE GOPALAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 10. NALLIBOINA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. LATE GOPALAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 11. NALLIBOINA BALAKRISHNA, S/O. LATE GOPALAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 12. SAMADHI SRILAKSHMI, W/O. BHASKARAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the above named 3 Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the Order dated 23-07-2024 passed in I.A.No.515 of 2023 in O.S.No.25 of 2021, on the file of Hon’ble VII Additional District Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District for the following grounds among other IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (92 DAYS the above C.R.P. filed against the I.A.No. 515 of 2023 in O.S.No. 25 of 2021, dated 23-07-2024 on the file of Hon'ble VII Additional District Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.25 of 2021 on the file of the Hon’ble VII Additional District Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District pending disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SATHEESH KUMAR EERLA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1263 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Sri B.Sai Sampath Kumar, learned counsel representing Smt. K.Pallavi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive, as the final decree was already passed. As such, he states that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY Dated: 14.11.2025 PSA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1263 of 2025 Date: 14.11.2025 PSA