DHARMENDRA PRATAP VATSAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMS/767/2025 · 2026-02-26
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 409 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 409 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No.3152 of 2025 Dinesh Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent With WPMS Nos.727/25, 733/25, 735/25, 739/25, 742/25, 743/25, 744/25, 745/25, 755/25, 759/25, 761/25, 763/25, 764/25, 765/25, 767/25, 769/25, 770/25, 781/25, 784/24, 805/25, 920/25, 926/25, 3044/25, 3047/25, 3089/25, 3094/25, 3136/25, 3140/25, 3150/25, 3151/25 and 3154/25 Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Sukhwani Singh, Mr. Parikshit Saini, Mr. Shubhr Rastogi, Mr. Shakti Singh, Mr. Neeraj Tiwari, Mr. Shiv Pande, Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Dr. G.S. Latwal, Mr. Mohit Kumar, Mr. Tilak Ram Sharma, Mr. SRS Gill, Mr. Milind Raj and Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel(s) for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Dy.A.G. for the State.
3. Mr. Sandeep Tiwari,
learned counsel for Chairman/Secretary, Cooperative Election Authority.
4.
Learned Counsel appearing for the parties unanimously made a statement at bar that in view of the subsequent developments, present writ petitions have rendered infructuous.
5. In view of the aforesaid statement, all the above- numbered writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26-02-2026 R.Dang