[2025:RJ-JP:41487] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6569/2025 1. Vakeel Son Of Shri Mormal, Resident Of Godhan, Tehsil Tapukda, District Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan. (Now In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal Tizara) 2. Hameed Son Of Shri Raybhan, Resident Of Godhan, Tehsil Tapukda, District Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan. 3. Mubarik Son Of Shri Chittar, Resident Of Godhan, Tehsil Tapukda, District Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Ishup Son Of Shri Pehlu Khan, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Khirzarpur, Police Station Bhiwadi Phase Iii, Police District Bhiwadi, District Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan. ----Complainant-Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6570/2025 1. Ishup Son Of Shri Pahlu Khan, Resident Of Khirzarpur, Tehsil Tapukda District Khairthal Tizara, Police Station Bhiwadi Phase Iii, Police District Bhiwadi, District Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan. 2. Yunus Son Of Shri Pahlu Khan, Resident Of Khirzarpur, Tehsil Tapukda District Khairthal Tizara, Police Station Bhiwadi Phase Iii, Police District Bhiwadi, District Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan. 3. Manzoor Son Of Shri Mohammad Taleem, Resident Of Dhirnaki, Tehsil Hatheen, District Palwal, Haryana. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Hameed Son Of Shri Raybhan, Resident Of Godhan, Tehsil Tapukda, District Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:41487] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6569/2025] ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari Mr. Laxman Meena for Mr. K I Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 10/10/2025 Since, both the criminal miscellaneous petitions share similar facts and common question(s) of law, they are being heard together and decided vide this common order. The criminal miscellaneous petition No. 6569/2025 under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for quashing the FIR No.0239/2024 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant (for brevity, ‘complainant’) at Police Station Bhiwadi Phase-III, District-Bhiwadi under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 307 and 110 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 whereas, the criminal miscellaneous petition No. 6570/2025 under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for quashing the FIR No.0238/2024 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant (for brevity, ‘complainant’) at Police Station Bhiwadi Phase-III, District-Bhiwadi under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 307 and 110 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The aforesaid FIRs are version and cross version of each other. Learned counsels for the respective parties, referring to and relying upon the compromise deed dated 10.09.2025 (Annexure- 3), would submit that the dispute of trivial nature giving rise to [2025:RJ-JP:41487] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6569/2025] the subject FIRs has amicably been settled between the parties. They, therefore, submit that the aforesaid cross FIRs may be quashed and set aside. The complainant and the accused persons in the respective cases are present before this Court and have been identified by their respective counsels. They, acknowledging the contents of the compromise deed dated 10.09.2025 (Annexure 3), submit that in view of amicable settlement of dispute amongst them, they have no objection if the subject FIRs are quashed and criminal miscellaneous petitions are allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. Looking to the nature of dispute being trivial, its amicable settlement between the parties and the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others: (2012) 10 SCC 303, this Court deems it just and proper to allow these criminal miscellaneous petitions. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petitions are allowed. The FIR Nos.0239/2024 & 0238/2024 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi Phase-III, District-Bhiwadi are quashed and set aside. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Tahir/Gautam/71-72