Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40899 (KAR)

SGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. K NAGARAJU REDDU

WP/25923/2024 · 2025-09-02

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34530 WP No. 25923 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 25923 OF 2024 (L-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMED PLAZA, NO.38/1 & 38/2, NEW BBMP NO-88/45/45, BERATENA AGRAHARA HOSUR ROAD, BENGLAURU - 560 100. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY REGIONAL BRANCH MANAGER THE REGISTRATION UNDER SEC.43A(4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956. …PETITIONER (BY SMT.SHIVANI P.MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI ARJUN RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. K.NAGARAJU REDDY, SON OF SRI SANKARA REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.180, 8TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI H.V.RAMACHANDRA RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE AWARD DATED 07.02.2024 PASSED IN ID.NO.48/2025 BY THE LEARNED SECOND ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU (ANNEXURE-C) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34530 WP No. 25923 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Smt.Shivani P.Murthy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Arjun Rao for the petitioner and Sri H.V.Ramachandra Rao, learned counsel for respondent are present. 2. The petitioner has filed a memo today along with the copy of the joint compromise petition dated 30.08.2025, a copy of the demand draft for a sum of Rs.34,00,000/- in favour of the respondent-workman and a computerized copy of the order dated 30.08.2025 in case No.APPL/0000030/2024 by the Labour Court, wherein the matter is referred to Lok Adalat, in view of the joint compromise petition filed by both the parties. 3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the matter has been amicably settled by executing the joint compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC, which has been filed and recorded by the Labour Court and hence, the matter is referred to Lok Adalat to compromise the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34530 WP No. 25923 of 2024 4. Learned counsel for respondent-workman acknowledges the receipt of Rs.34,00,000/- by way of demand draft. Therefore, learned counsels for the parties submit that no further dispute subsists, in view of the compromise entered into between both the parties. 5. Under the circumstances, learned counsels for the parties seek leave of this Court to dispose of this petition, in view of the joint compromise petition entered into and the matter being referred to Lok Adalath. 6. Accordingly, I pass the following: ORDER i. This petition is disposed of in terms of the joint compromise petition dated 30.08.2025. Ordered accordingly. SD/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN