2025:CGHC:44248 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10194 of 2025 Rakesh Kumar Pathak S/o Late Arjun Lal Pathak, Aged About 52 Years Posted At Assistant Grade - Iii, Office Of Assistant Commissioner, (Department Of Co-Operative And Assistant Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies), District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Co-Opertive And Assistant Registrar Of Cooperative Societies, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Rishikant Mahobia , Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 01.09.2025 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Balrampur to Bijapur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer order the petitioner has already made representation which is still pending before the transfer committee, therefore, he may be permitted to pursue the remedy of representation before the concerned authority. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.02 10:47:23 +0530 Wps 10194 of 2025 2 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any objection on the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the writ petition. 5. As per Clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making representation against the transfer order before the transfer committee who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 is reproduced as below: “8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथात शासेकीय से वकी द्वार अपनां स्थानांतरण की थिवरूद्ध अभ्याव दनां की वल स्थानांतरण नांथित की उल्लंघनां होनां पर हो उक्त उल्लंघनां होनां वल की थि की की सेबंध में$ स्पष्ट आधर की सेथा स्थानांतरण आद शा जार होनां की थितथिथा से 15 थिदवसे की भीतर प्रश्नाधनां स्थानांतरण आद शा की प्रथित सेथिहोत शासेनां द्वार गथि-त वरिरष्ठ सेथि0व की सेथिमेंथित की सेयजाकी एव सेथि0व, सेमेंन्य प्रशासेनां थिवभीग की प्रस्तु4त थिकीय जा सेकी ग। सेथिमेंथित द्वार ऐसे प्रकीरण की इसे स्थानांतरण नांथित की प्रकीशा में$ परक्षण कीरनां की पश्चात अपनां अनां4शासे सेबंथिधत थिवभीग ” की प्र थि:त की जाएग। 6. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the transfer committee against transfer order, this court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the transfer committee along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the transfer committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation so Wps 10194 of 2025 3 made by the petitioner in accordance with law in an objective manner and pass a reasoned order on its own merits within a further period of two weeks. 7. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the said transfer committee. 8. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma