Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40899 (AP)

Ms. Nowhera Shaik, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/8039/2019 · 2025-11-20

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010187042019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 8039/2019 Between: 1. MS. NOWHERA SHAIK,, D/O.SHRI NANA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, HEERA GROUP OF COMPANIES, R/O.H.NO.9-4-134/A/5/23/1, 5TH FLOOR, H.S.RESIDENCY, VALI COLONY, GOLKONDA, HYDERABAD, STATE OF TELANGANA AND ALSO THE FOUNDER OF HEERA INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC COLLEGE-WOMENS ARABIC COLLEGE, CHANDRAGIRI VILLAGE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. HEERA GOLD EXIM LIMITED,, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MS. NOWHERA SHAIK, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 10-4-3, FLAT NO.123, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD, STATE OF TELANGANA ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHANDRAZIRI POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioners: 1. M/S MARY LEGAL CONSULTANCY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8039 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioners either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the petitioners on 03.11.2025 and 06.10.2025 also. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on the previous occasion submitted that as per police record, no report is received from the writ petitioners by the Station House Officer, and the allegations in the affidavit are not true and correct. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 21.11.2025 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 36 WRIT PETITION No:8039 OF 2019 Date: 21.11.2025 W PSK