Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010174822022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1204/2022 Between:
1. INDULA NOOKARJU, S/O. APPALA SWAMI, AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS, REP. BY ITS G.P.A.YELLAYI RAVI KUMAR, S/O. Y SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.9-29-7, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAM, VISHAKAPATNAM. 2. MS.VELLAGE SAROJINI, W/O. VENKATI, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, R/O.KOTHANAGAVARAM VILLAGE, MUNAGAPAKA MANDAL, VISHAKAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. RAJAT BHARGAVA, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. A G CHINNI KRISHNA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. K JAYAPRAKASH, TAHILISIDAR,
ANAKAPALLI DIVISION, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. MS J TARAKESHWARI, THILILISIDAR FOR THE YEAR 2019 ANAKAPALLI DIVISION VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. P MURALI KRISHNA, THILILISIDAR FOR THE YEAR 2020 ANAKAPALLI DIVISION VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RR 4 AND 5 IMPLEDED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.06/01/2022. VIDE IA NO.1
2
OF 2022. IN CC NO.1204 OF 2022. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents no 2 and 3 for willful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders passed by his Lordship Hon'ble Challa Kodanda Ram in WPMP.No.2860 of 2015 in W.P.No.2146 of 2015, dated 05- 02-2015, under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent No.4 and 5 herein as Party Respondent in CC.No.1204 of 2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. P SUBASH
3
The Court made the following Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interim order against which the present contempt case has been filed has merged into final order, dated 03.11.2022, in which the writ petition was allowed. In the circumstances, learned counsel submits that the present contempt case has become infructuous and requires to be withdrawn. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date: 14.11.2025 KA
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1204/2022
Date: 14.11.2025 KA