Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.27688 of 2022 APHC010452882022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27688 OF 2022 Between:
1. Abinika Radha Krishnan, W/o Tarun Inabathuni, age 36 Yrs, Flat No. 4413, 4th Blook, Indira Enclave, Ayodhyanagar,
Near Raghavendra theatre,Vijayawada (Urban), Gandhinagaram, Krishna, Vijayawada(Urban), A.P. -520003 ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of A P, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Building, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist. 2. The Circle Inspector cum Station House Officer, A.S.Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 3. Tarun Inabathuni, S/o Jitha manmadha Rao, age 41 Years, Occ- Engineer, R/o Flat No. 8111, Prestige Shantiniketan, Whitefield-ITPL Main road, Bangalore North, Bengaluru, Mahadevapura, Karnataka-560048. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the official respondents not
Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.27688 of 2022 taking steps for cancellation of anticipatory Bail which is granted in favour of the 3rd respondent in CRL.P.No. 5118 of 2022 dated 21.07.2022 on the file of this Hon'ble Court, arrest and surrender the pass port of the 3rd respondent are illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violation of the provisions of the Constitution of India and orders in CrI.P.No. 5118/2022 and further direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate steps for cancellation of above Anticipatory Bail orders In CRL.P.No. 5118/2022 dated 21.7.2022 on the file of this Hon'ble court , arrest the 3rd respondent on the ground of the violation of the conditions in CRL.P.No. 5118/2022 and surrender the passport of the 3rd respondent before concerned Magistrate Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.08.2022 within a week and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.27688 of 2022 The Court made the following ORDER:
1.
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the official respondents not taking steps for cancellation of anticipatory Bail which is granted in favour of the 3rd respondent in CRL.P.No. 5118 of 2022 dated 21.07.2022 on the file of this Hon'ble Court, arrest and surrender the pass port of the 3rd respondent are illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violation of the provisions of the Constitution of India and orders in CrI.P.No. 5118/2022 and further direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate steps for cancellation of above Anticipatory Bail orders In CRL.P.No. 5118/2022 dated 21.7.2022 on the file of this Hon'ble court , arrest the 3rd respondent on the ground of the violation of the conditions in CRL.P.No. 5118/2022 and surrender the passport of the 3rd respondent before concerned Magistrate Court..”
2. Heard Sri T.V.V.Koteswararao, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents.. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 3rd respondent failed to comply the conditions imposed by this Court while granting bail and the prosecution is not taking appropriate steps for cancellation of bail granted to the 3rd respondent. 4. A perusal of the material on record would show that the 3rd respondent herein was granted bail in Crl.P.No.5118 of 2022 by this Court by imposing certain conditions. The grievance of the petitioner herein is that
Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.27688 of 2022 the 3rd respondent failed to comply the said conditions and that the prosecution is not taking steps for cancellation of bail granted to the 3rd respondent. Admittedly, the petitioner herein is the complainant who is the wife of 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent was granted bail with certain conditions and it is specifically directed that any of the above conditions were not complied by the 3rd respondent, the prosecution is at liberty to move appropriate application for cancellation of bail. However, there is no such non compliance of the condition reported by the prosecution for moving application for cancellation of bail. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________
Dr.
JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 19.11.2025 Dvs
Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.27688 of 2022 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27688 OF 2022 Date: 19.11.2025 Dvs