APHC010580322017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 20187/2017 Between: 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER,, SUPER SPINNING MILLS LTD., B-UNIT, KOTNUR, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PERSONNEL MANAGER,, SUPER SPINNING MILLS LTD., B- UNIT, KOTNUR, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE CHAIR PERSONCUMPRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. VALMIKI RAMAPPA RAMU, S/O.PEDDA RAMAPPA, KOTHIPI VILLAGE & POST, HINDUPUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in E.P.No.6 of 2013 in I.D.No.217 of 2000 on the file of the 1st Respondent the Learned Chair Personcum-Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ananthapuramu and quash its order dated 24.4.2017 and consequently dismiss E.P.No.6 of 2013 filed by the 2nd Respondent herein and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 24730 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings including execution and recovery of any amount pursuant to the order dated 24.4.2017 in E.P.No.6 of 2013 on the file of the 1st Respondent the Learned Chair Person-cum-Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ananthapuramu, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: 1. On 28.10.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No representation on either side. List the matter on 31.10.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. On 31.10.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioners. List the matter next week under the same caption 'for dismissal.” 3. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioners, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 4. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 07.11.2025 Dvs 100 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.20187 of 2017 Date: 07.11.2025 Dvs