Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72956 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13073 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt Ayushi Agarwal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Swetashwa Agarwal,Yash Raj Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to direct the learned courts concerned across the State of Uttar Pradesh to accept the single surety of reasonable amount with personal bond of applicant in all the 87 wherein applicant has already been released on bail by several Coordinate Benches of this Court, those cases are mentioned in paragraph 48 of the affidavit filed in support of this petition. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant sought the direction of this Court in shape of instructing the learned courts concerned to accept the single surety of reasonable amount with personal bond of applicant in all the 87 cases wherein applicant has already been released on bail by several Coordinate Benches of this Court. 4. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant application. 5. During the course of argument, a precise query has been raised before learned counsel for applicant that whether applicant has ever preferred the bail bond in pursuance to the aforesaid cases wherein he has been enlarged on bail by this Court and if so, whether there is a specific denial from learned trial courts concerned in shape of asking separate sureties for separate cases. In response to the query, learned counsel for applicant fairly submitted that applicant never preferred any bail bond in pursuance to any cases in which he has been enlarged on bail and there is no specific denial from learned trial courts concerned. 6. In view of aforementioned discussions and after perusing the records, this Court finds that no prejudice has been caused to the applicant as applicant never intended to prefer bail bonds in pursuance to bail orders pertaining to year 2022 to till date passed by several Coordinate Benches of this Court and as such, there is hardly any denial available in record with regard to accepting single surety of reasonable amount with personal bond of applicant in each case, hence, no cause of action arises in favour of applicant to pursue the instant application. 7. 7. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed at this stage. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Vivek Kr. Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad