IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 503 Harprem Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. Present: None Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab Mr. DS Gill, Advocate for Mr. GS Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for refix the seniority of the petitioner promote him as Joint Director, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned State counsel the preliminary submission of the wherein it has been stated that at Sr. No.15, while the private respondents were at 5, 8, 9, 10 and he was considered by the DPC but his case for promotion to the post of Joint Director will be considered on turn on seniority rebuttal by filing any replication. 3. D case lis still subsists 04.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1558 Date of decision: ingh Gill Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab Mr. DS Gill, Advocate for Mr. GS Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for seniority of the petitioner over and above promote him as Joint Director, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned State counsel draws the attention of preliminary submission of the written statement wherein it has been stated that as per the final seniority list petitioner was placed at Sr. No.15, while the private respondents were at 5, 8, 9, 10 and he was y the DPC but his case for promotion to the post of Joint Director will be considered on turn on seniority-cum rebuttal by filing any replication. Disposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived still subsists. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1558-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.04.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. GS Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to over and above private respondents and promote him as Joint Director, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. draws the attention of the Court to para 1 written statement filed by respondent No.1 as per the final seniority list petitioner was placed at Sr. No.15, while the private respondents were at 5, 8, 9, 10 and he was y the DPC but his case for promotion to the post of Joint Director -merit basis, to which there is no isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No directing the respondents to private respondents and promote him as Joint Director, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 1 of filed by respondent No.1 as per the final seniority list petitioner was placed at Sr. No.15, while the private respondents were at 5, 8, 9, 10 and he was y the DPC but his case for promotion to the post of Joint Director to which there is no isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.04 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.