Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40892 (BOM)

AKSHAY MARUTI WARKE v. SATISH RAMCHANDRA HAWAL

ALP/159/2024 · 2025-10-09

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

115-ALP-159-2024 (CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 159 OF 2024 Akshay Maruti Warke ...Applicant Versus Satish Ramchandra Hawal ...Respondent ….. Mr. Anand S. Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent-State. ….. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 9th OCTOBER, 2025 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent No.2 – State. 2. Learned counsel for the Applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Celestium Financial Vs. Ghanasekaran Etc. (2005) SC 2099. 3. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the Applicant, the Application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. The Application is dismissed and disposed off as withdrawn. Sajakali Jamadar SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date: 2025.10.11 14:13:47 +0530 115-ALP-159-2024 (CR).DOC 5. Learned Sessions Judge shall consider the issue of delay as the present application was pending. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Sajakali Jamadar