[2025:RJ-JP:50162] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19363/2025 Anita Raghav W/o Late Rajendra Singh Parihar, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of House No. C-35, Shrinath Puram, Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner. 2. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena Ms. Neha Goswami For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the case and after examining the same be pleased to quashed and set aside the order dated 28.05.2024 and direct the respondent to allow the petitioner in service at her present place of posting with all consequential benefits. 2. Any prejudicial order to the interest of the petitioner, if passed during the pendency of the writ petition, the same may kindly be taken on record and be pleased to quash and set aside. 3. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may consider just and proper, in the facts and [2025:RJ-JP:50162] (2 of 2) [CW-19363/2025] circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/35