[2025:RJ-JP:49975] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10066/2025 Mange Lal Sain Son Of Shri Bhoner Lal, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Village, Post (Karanpura) Rampura, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Panchayatiraj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur Through Its Additional Chief Secretary. 2. Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayatiraj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Karauli (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena and Mr. Mahendra Pratap Singh for Mr. K.P. Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed to that your lordship may kindly be pleased to accept further be pleased this writ petition and direct the respondents Zilla Parishad Karauli to added full 12th class marks of petitioner and given appointment to petitioner on the post of L.D.C. in the with all consequential service benefit larger interest of justice.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits the petitioner may be granted permission to file an [2025:RJ-JP:49975] (2 of 2) [CW-10066/2025] appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /252