ADIDAS AG & ANR. v. AMAN KUMAR PRAJAPATI TRADING AS AMAN FOOTWEAR
CS(COMM)/406/2025 · 2025-05-15
Amit Bansal
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40879 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40879 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CS(COMM) 406/2025 $~24. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 406/2025 ADIDAS AG & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. Anubhav Chhabra, Ms. Rishika Aggarwal and Ms. Ritu Khandelwal, Advocates. versus AMAN KUMAR PRAJAPATI TRADING AS AMAN FOOTWEAR .....Defendant Through: Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri and Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocates. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 15.05.2025
1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant, on instructions from the defendant, who is present in Court, submits that he has no objection if a decree of permanent injunction is passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendant. 2. Counsel for the defendant assures the Court that the defendant would not deal in any products bearing the marks ‘ABBIBAS/ ’, ‘abbibas three bars device mark/ ’, ‘Three Bars device mark/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/05/2025 at 12:23:24
CS(COMM) 406/2025 ’, ‘Three Stripes device mark/ ’, ‘Trefoil device mark/ ’, the two stripes device mark and the four stripes device mark or any other mark/ device/ logo identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs’ marks. 3. Counsel further submits that the defendant wishes to settle the matter and is agreeable to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- as costs to the plaintiffs. 4. Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in terms of the prayer clauses 63(a), 63(b), 63(c) of the plaint. 5. Further, in terms of prayer clause 63(g) of the plaint, a sum of Rs. 50,000/- shall be paid as costs to the plaintiffs within two (2) weeks from today. 6. In terms of prayer clause 63(d) of the plaint, the defendant shall deliver up to the plaintiffs all the infringing goods that were seized by the Local Commissioner. 7. Since the matter has been settled, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 100% of the Court Fees in favour of the plaintiffs, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. AMIT BANSAL, J MAY 15, 2025 kd This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/05/2025 at 12:23:24