1 2025:CGHC:35942 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8854 of 2023 1 - Arjun Singh S/o Shri Ram Prasad Singh Aged About 59 Years Working As Range Officer, Khadgawan Range, District Korea (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Special Secretary, Forest And Climate Diversion Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 3 - The Chief Conservator Of Forest Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.). 4 - The Divisional Forest Officer Koriya Forest Division, Baikunthpur, District- Korea (C.G.). 5 - Diksha Burman D/o Shri Rambilas Burman Posted As Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Khadgawan, Korea Forest Division, District- Korea (C.G.) (Presently Transferred To Sakti Range, District- Sakti) (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prashant Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/07/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner from the respondents. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting aside/quashing the impugned 11.10.2023 (Annexure P/1) and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at Forest Range Khadgawan, Forest Division, Korea, District-Korea (C.G.). 10.3 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including cost of the petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 3 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat