Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 993 of 2024 1 - Parag Pandey S/o Late Ashwani Pandey Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Dhamini, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) At Present Devnandan Nagar, Phase 2, Baima Nagoi Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Pramila Pandey Wd/o Late Mr. Ashwani Pandey Aged About 49 Years House Wife, R/o Village Dhamni, Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Ku. Apurva Pandey D/o Late Mr. Ashwani Pandey Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Dhamni, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Dhruv Prasad Pandey S/o Late Mr. Tribhuwan Nath Pandey Aged About 68 Years R/o Chakarbhatha Camp, P.G. Chakarbhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C .G.) 4 - Shravan Pandey S/o Mr. Raghunandan Prasad Pandey Aged About 63 Years R/o Vijayapuram, Sipat Road, Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Rajni Pandey Wd/o Mr. Paduman Pandey Aged About 49 Years R/o Mata Chaura, Old Sarkanda, House No. 48, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Aadarsh Pandey S/o Late Mr. Paduman Pandey Aged About 19 Years R/o Mata Chaura, Old Sarkanda, House No. 48, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Ku. Akanksha Pandey D/o Late Mr. Paduman Pandey Aged About 15 Years Minor Through Guardian At Litem/ Wali, Mother Smt. Rajni Pandey, Widow Of Late Mr. Paduman Pandey R/o Mata Chaura, Old Sarkanda, House No. 48, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Shri Om Prakash Sahu, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 7 : Shri Koushal Yadav, Advocate. For the State/Respondent No.8 Shri Atanu Ghosh, Dy. Govt. Advocate. NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.06.20 18:57:26 +0530
2 D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal, Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order on Board Per:
Sanjay S. Agrawal, J.
20/06/2025
1. Heard on admission.
2. This MCC has been filed for restoration of appeal, being, First Appeal No.224 of 2015, which was dismissed in default by this Court vide
order dated 10/07/2024.
3. On due consideration, for the reasons assigned in the application for restoration of the said appeal, which is duly supported by an affidavit, we are inclined to allow the same.
4. Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and dispose of, and the appeal being First Appeal No.224 of 2015 is directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE JUDGE
Kamde