APHC010015422023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 943/2023 Between: 1. SRI KANASANI ESWAR REDDY, S/O. K NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. 1-85,VIDYANAGAR 8TH LINE, MULAGUNTAPADU, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS., HOME SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 4. V NAGAMALLESWARARAO, S/O NOT KNOWN OCC. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PRESENT WORKING AT CUMBUM, POLICE STATION, CUMBUM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. A ASHOK, S/O. ANUK BABU, OCC. HEAD CONSTABLE, AGE 39 YEARS, RIO. 13-26, AMBEDKAR NAGAR ROAD, ULAVAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of Official Respondents not acting against the complaint filed by the Petitioner on 1.11.2019 and 12.09.2022 even after receiving the enquiry report to the 3rd Respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional Consequently direct the Official Respondents to take necessary action on basis of enquiry report against the 4th and 5th Respondents and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to consider the representation made by the Petitioner on 12.09.2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAIDU SIVA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 943 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of Official Respondents not acting against the complaint filed by the Petitioner on 01.11.2019 and 12.09.2022 even after receiving the enquiry report to the 3rd Respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional Consequently direct the Official Respondents to take necessary action on basis of enquiry report against the 4th and 5th Respondents and pass such…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions, would submit that as ordered by the respondent No.3/Superintendent of Police, the Sub-Divisional Police Officer conducted enquiry and found the allegations made in the complaint are false. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.943 of 2023 Dated.02.12.2025 UPS 267