Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40875 (AP)

Kshatri Bangaramma, v. Sanga Rajeswari @ Ragjulamma,

SA/57/2017 · 2025-11-20

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010020182017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 57/2017 Between: 1. KSHATRI BANGARAMMA,, W/O. MOHAN RAO, AGED 39 YEARS, HOSUEWIFE, RIO. AMEBERUPURAM COLONY, GOVADA POST, CHODAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SANGA RAJESWARI RAGJULAMMA, W/O. LATE TATABBAYI, AGED 49 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.50-64-16, 50TH WARD, KANAKAMMAVARI STREET, RESAPUVANIPALEM, RAJENDRANAGAR, SEETHAMMAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. 2. SANGA RAMBABU, S/O. LATE TATABBAYI, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.50-64-16, 50TH WARD, KANAKAMMAVARI STREET, RESAPUVANIPALEM, RAJENDRANAGAR, SEETHAMMAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM-16 3. SANGA RAMESH, S/O. LATE TATABBAYI, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.50-64-16, 50TH WARD, KANAKAMMAVARI STREET, RESAPUVANIPALEM, RAJENDRANAGAR, SEETHAMMAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. 4. SANGA RAPPA RAO, S/O. LATE TATABBAYI, AGED 27 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.50-64-16, 50TH WARD, KANAKAMMAVARI STREET, RESAPUVANIPALEM, RAJENDRANAGAR, SEETHAMMAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. 2 5. SANGA PARVATI, D/O. LATE TATABBAYI, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.50-64-16, 50TH WARD, KANAKAMMAVARI STREET, RESAPUVANIPALEM, RAJENDRANAGAR, SEETHAMMAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. M V HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CH SHANMUKHA RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 57/2017 JUDGMENT: When the matter has been taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) dated 19.11.2025 for withdrawing the Second Appeal and the same is placed on record. He further represented that the matter has been settled in between both the parties outside the Court and requested permission for withdrawal of the Second Appeal. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Dated: 21.11.2025 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO 34 SECOND APPEAL NO: 57/2017 Dated: 21.11.2025 MH