[2025:RJ-JP:50843] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4628/2019 1. Pradeep S/o Bhagchand, Aged About 28 Years, Occupation Private Service, Resident Of Quarter No. 11, Type-II, Police Quarter, New Rajendra Nagar Police Station, New Delhi-11060 2. Dharmesh S/o Bhagchand, Aged About 22 Years, Occupation Student, Permanent Resident Of Quarter No. 11, Type-II, Police Quarter, New Rajendra Nagar Police Station, New Delhi-11060 ----Appellants/Defendant No.2 & 3 Versus 1. Bhagchand S/o Hariram, Aged About 50 Years, Occupation Service, Delhi Police, Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. …….Respondent/Defendant No.1 2. Ankit S/o Sh. Bhagchand, Aged About 12 Years, Minor Through Guardian Bhagchand Father Self, Permanent Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. 3. Prakash Chand S/o Hariram, Aged About 65 Years, Occupation Retired Bsnl, Servant Resident Roopbas, Alwar. 4. Maansingh S/o Prakash Chand, Aged About 40 Years, Occupation Service, Permanent Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. 5. Hariram Meena S/o Late Bodanlal Meena, Aged About 92 Years, Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. ……..Proforma Respondent/Defendant No.4 to 7 6. Vijaypal Meena S/o Hariram Meena, Aged About 55 Years, Occupation Office Assistant, Dic, Office Alwar, Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. 7. Kuldeep S/o Vijaypal, Aged About 31 Years, Occupation Service Lic, Permanent Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. 8. Dheeraj S/o Sh. Vijaypal, Aged About 20 Years, Occupation Student, Permanent Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. 9. Sundarlal S/o Hariram, Aged About 55 Years, Occupation Service Udc, Akashwani, Alwar, Resident [2025:RJ-JP:50843] (2 of 2) [CMA-4628/2019] Roopbas, Alwar. 10. Sandeep S/o Sh. Sundarlal, Aged About 29 Years, Occupation Service Jvvnl, Alwar, Permanent Resident Of Roopbas, Alwar. ----Proforma Respondents/Plaintiffs For Appellant(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mohit Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment/Order 16/12/2025 1. None present for the appellants. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present appeal arises out of the order dated 28.05.2019 passed on an application for temporary injunction. Learned counsel further submits that the suit has already been decided by the learned trial Court, therefore, the appeal has become infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 4. It is, however, made clear that if the suit has not been decided, the appellants shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application for recall of this order. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/73