- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37218 WP No. 24369 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 24369 OF 2022 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. MURALIDHAR S/O. HANUMANTHU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PRESIDENT HASSAN DISTRICT CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION (R) SRI. M. VISHWESHWARAYA BHAVAN VIDHYANAGAR, OPP. DENTAL COLLEGE, HASSAN-573201 2. SUNEEL KUMAR M S/O. P. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, SECRETARY HASSAN DISTRICT CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION (R) SRI. M. VISHWESHWARAYA BHAVAN VIDHYANAGAR, OPP. DENTAL COLLEGE, HASSAN-573201 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION BANGALORE-560001 Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37218 WP No. 24369 of 2022 2. THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY-3 DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 3. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN-573201 4. HASSAN DISTRICT CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION (R) SRI. M. VISHWESHWARAYA BHAVAN VIDHYANAGAR, OPP. DENTAL COLLEGE, HASSAN-573201 REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETY ACT, 1960 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3; NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 24.11.2022 MADE IN GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.SA E 72 CSR 2022 BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37218 WP No. 24369 of 2022 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has become infructuous, since the term of the administrator has come to an end and the State Government has not taken any decision to extend same. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous. 3. In view of dismissal of main petition, I.A.No.1/2023 does not survive for consideration and the same stands rejected. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16